Alright, so here’s the situation: I’ve developed a course packaged as a SCORM file, or alternatively, as an xAPI file. However, the client doesn’t utilize any traditional LMS; instead, they prefer to use Google Classroom. Now, I’m a bit puzzled by the widespread popularity of Google Classroom, but I suppose it’s free, which might explain it. The issue arises because Google Classroom doesn’t support SCORM content.
Just to clarify, hosting the course on my own LMS isn’t feasible due to privacy concerns—clients prefer to maintain control over their enrollees’ data, and it would likely be cost-prohibitive anyway. Typically, I focus on creating courses rather than hosting them.
Now, ordinarily, I could simply explain to the client that they need an LMS for this to work. However, I’m keen to explore alternative solutions here. While the potential revenue from this sale may not be significant, its success could prove highly influential and unlock numerous opportunities. So, losing the sale isn’t something I’m eager to entertain.
Someone suggested a potential solution, but I’m skeptical. Here’s what they proposed:
Step 1: Utilize Moodle (a free LMS) and integrate it with Google Classroom. (Though I’ve heard Moodle can be quite challenging to master, so there’s that hurdle to overcome.)
Step 2: Host the SCORM file on Google Drive. (Alternatively, someone mentioned using Amazon S3, which operates similarly as a cloud storage service.)
The reasoning behind this solution is that both Moodle and Google are free, making it a cost-effective approach. However, I have reservations about its feasibility. If Google Drive can host SCORM content for Moodle or any other LMS, why would Moodle offer storage solutions? I suspect there might be some sort of catch that I’m overlooking.
I find myself getting lost in the complexities of this process. Could someone provide guidance on whether this approach could work? If not, I’m open to exploring other viable solutions.
I appreciate any assistance you can offer!