Are traditional learning models finally hitting their expiration date? 🤔

Seeking Advice Forum
1

I know this might trigger those of us who have been in L&D a long time, but it’s time to face the music: frameworks like ADDIE, Kirkpatrick, and Gagne’s could soon be obsolete. With AI stepping up, emerging learning platforms are set to handle everything inherently, automating the heavy lifting while letting us focus on one thing—outcomes.

According to a recent Gartner survey, 85% of L&D leaders say there’s a surge coming in skills development needs, thanks to AI and digital trends.

Here’s what’s driving the shift to outcome-driven, agile learning:

  1. Learning tied directly to earning
  2. Embedded in day-to-day workflows
  3. Hands-on experiential learning > theory
  4. Just-in-time microbursts
  5. Personalized, dynamic pathways
  6. Layered skills that build over time
  7. AI = speed and scale like never before
  8. Shared collective impact across the org

Are we finally done with the legacy models that don’t keep up with today’s needs? Or is there still life left in them? What do you think? Would love to hear where you stand! :point_down:

2

This is a hot topic! I feel like while some models might be outdated, they do have foundational value. What do you think we should keep?

3

Kimberley said:
This is a hot topic! I feel like while some models might be outdated, they do have foundational value. What do you think we should keep?

Great point! I think we can take the core principles of these models and adapt them to fit new tech and trends. Balance is key.

4

I totally agree! AI is changing the game, but there’s something to be said for tried-and-true methods. They can still inform our practices.

5

ClickCraftCrew1 said:
I totally agree! AI is changing the game, but there’s something to be said for tried-and-true methods. They can still inform our practices.

Exactly! It’s about blending the old and new to create effective learning experiences.

6

I’m a bit skeptical about completely ditching traditional models. They do provide structure, which I think is still important.

7

DukeHenry4 said:
I’m a bit skeptical about completely ditching traditional models. They do provide structure, which I think is still important.

Totally get that! A structured approach can help guide new initiatives while we explore more innovative methods.

8

I think the key is flexibility. We need to be able to pivot and adapt to new technologies while not losing sight of effective learning principles.

9

ethan said:
I think the key is flexibility. We need to be able to pivot and adapt to new technologies while not losing sight of effective learning principles.

Absolutely! It’s all about finding that balance between innovation and proven strategies.

10

Do you think organizations are ready to make these changes? Some might be hesitant to let go of traditional methods.

11

Erick said:
Do you think organizations are ready to make these changes? Some might be hesitant to let go of traditional methods.

That’s a good question. Change can be tough, but I think the pressures of the current job market will push them to adapt.